When the Nest learning thermostat hit the smart home market almost a decade ago, it seemed ready to change our way of looking at smart home technology: Lindsey Turrentine, CNET's then-editor-in-chief,within a week of trying it out. The sale? Nest would learn over time to adjust to your comfort and budget. It was the promise of the realized automation – a house that really takes care of you and yourself.
But a few years later, another device called it, At first, the smart speaker couldn't do much except accommodate the digital assistant Alexa. Even the developers did not fully recognize Alexa’s potential at the time of release, Robert Amazon, vice president of software for devices and services, recently told me. By 2020, however, voice control has almost become a requirement for smart home devices ,
These two approaches for the smart home area are inevitably contradictory: automation aims to reduce your daily tasks around the house, while language support changes the device for their execution and instantiates your active role in them. Alexa and Google Assistant are winning this fight for a reason: they offer a more inspiring vision for the future.
The promise (and the problems) in automation
In theory, I like automation: a house that does everything you expect, but excludes many of the small touch points that take up your time. It sounds like a no-brainer. I hate running through rooms to turn off all the lights while my 2 and 3 year olds whine at the front door about wanting to leave the house. I hate going back to a cold home after shutting down the thermostat for a weekend out of town. I hate romping around in a dark house to provide my sons with their drinking cups in the middle of the night.
While a handful of devices help alleviate these particular pain points – most directly, thatmotion-sensitive night light and the learning functions of the thermostat – real automation that goes beyond these problems seems far away. I tested and Domestic life is often too fluid for such devices. It is even more important that someone still has to do the automation.
When we buy our phones and laptops, we expect that they are already programmed for us. However, if we want an automated home, we have to do a lot of the "programming" ourselves. Nest & # 39; s thermostat has set itself apart from the crowd by learning how to use it, but the majority of automation in the market today requires you to take the time to set up your own routines: "If I open my garage, switch on the lights and open the blinds. "Or:" At 11:00 p.m. turn off all lights and lock all doors. "
These routines are really helpful, but it's tedious to set up and keep track of. In addition, there are always exceptions to the rule, and it's not fun to be locked out one night because you put the garbage on the street (yes, I was locked out by smart locks before, along with half of my office workers) , , And these annoyances don't even take into account the frustrating peculiarities that are typical of many of the platforms for setting such routines. (Works with Google Assistant, for example, and doesn't even let you delete routines.)
Basically, however, home automation faces a philosophical problem. Automation examines everything we have done in our homes in the past – opening blinds, switching lights, closing the door – and then asks how these things can be done effortlessly. Alexa and Google Assistant have been less concerned with what we're already doing than with what we're doing could be to do. It is a more future-oriented approach that is more popular with people who are chasing the future.
Welcome home, Alexa
At a private happy hour aroundWhile Guy Fieri was preparing to come out, tell a few groans, and cook with Alexa, I had the opportunity to chat with Amazon developers. There, the Vice President of Smart Home, Daniel Rausch, informed me that Alexa should become a home provider that does not require electricity or water. It is available in almost every room and optimized for convenience and accessibility.
It sounds like a lofty goal, but Amazon has been aggressively pursuing it. Between its growing line of speakers and displays – and super affordable, modular devices like thatand – Alexa could soon be in every room in your house. And if it controls yours , Your , Your . , then it could actually be useful in each of these rooms too.
Google Nest appears to be taking a similar approach, particularly by investing in devices like the thermostat.. and smoke alarms – all now integrated into the Works with Google Assistant program and a little less focused on the "learning" aspects of their technology than on the language-integrated aspects.
By giving priority to omnipresence for the moment, Amazon and Google drown out older, automation-focused devices. Paradoxically, they breathed new life into home automation as an idea.
Save the promise of automation
Alexa Guard was a simple software upgrade, but when it met almost every Echo device in 2018, it also offered a crucial insight into the future of the voice assistant at home: the function listened to intrusions and simulated automatically connected lights at the same time as a occupied house and communicated with security systems like ADT. It wasn't a feature that a large number of customers were begging for, in part because few of us had imagined it.
Automation has the potential to be banal (turning on the lights when you enter a room) or being visionary (trying to reduce the likelihood of break-ins and improve their results). The same imagination that gave birth to a voice assistant that felt like science fiction a decade ago is beginning to infect how companies think about automation.
The kitchen area offers many examples: aworks, for example, on automating several cooking steps – With online recipes to choose from, you can cook, automatically preheat the oven as soon as you start preparing, or even to let you know when your meat is fully cooked.
These newer examples of automation give me the hope that developers in all areas – not only in language support – will look to the future with increasing networking and networking of our houses and pay less attention to optimizing our lives than redefining it.